(Solution) NR716 Week 6: Assignment | Translation Science and Synthesis

Rubric

W6_Translation Science & Synthesis Grading Rubric
W6_Translation Science & Synthesis Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

Introduction

Requirements:
1. Use a synthesis of research evidence and non-research evidence when writing this section of the paper.
2.Write a one-sentence purpose statement.
3.Introduce the practice problem.
4. Introduce the evidence-based intervention using research evidence.

15 pts

Highest Level of Performance
Includes all requirements and provides an excellent introduction.

13 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance
Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient introduction.

11 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial introduction.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped introduction.
15 pts

Analysis of the Practice Problem

Requirements:
1. Use a synthesis of research evidence and non-research evidence when writing this section of the paper.
2. Present the following at the national and local levels:
a. Significance
b. Prevalence
c. Mortality
d. Economic ramifications of the practice problem

20 pts

Highest Level of Performance
Includes all requirements and an provides an in-depth analysis of the practice problem.

18 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance
Includes all requirements and provides a very sufficient analysis of the practice problem.

16 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial analysis of the practice problem.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped analysis of the practice problem.
20 pts

Evidence Synthesis

Requirements:
1. Use a synthesis of research evidence when writing this section of the paper.
2. Identify the main themes and salient points that emerge from a synthesis of research evidence.
3. Compare and contrast the main points from a synthesis of research evidence.
4. Present an objective overarching synthesis of research evidence about the intervention.

40 pts

Highest Level of Performance
Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth evidence synthesis.

36 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance
Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient evidence synthesis.

32 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial evidence synthesis.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped evidence synthesis.
40 pts

Practice Question

Requirements:
1. Write a one-sentence clear and concise practice question that includes:
a. Population
b. Intervention
c. Comparison
d. Outcome(s)
e. Timeframe

15 pts

Highest Level of Performance
Includes all requirements of the practice question. The question is excellently written.

13 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance
Includes all requirements of the practice question. The question is sufficiently written.

11 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance
Includes fewer than all requirements of the practice question and/or question is partially written.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance
Includes less than all requirements of the practice question and/or question is poorly written.
15 pts

Translation Science Theory or Model

Requirements:
1. Apply the translation science theory or model to support the practice change project.
2. Determine how the identified translation science theory or model serves as the framework for the design of a practice change project.
3. Propose how stakeholders are integrated into the design of the theory or model.

30 pts

Highest Level of Performance
Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth discussion of translation model and/or stakeholders integration into theory or model.

27 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance
Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient discussion of translation model and/or how stake holders integration into theory or model.

24 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance
Includes fewer than all requirements and provides a partial discussion of translation model and/or how stake holders integration into theory or model.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or an undeveloped discussion on how stake holders are integrated into the theory or model.
30 pts

Conclusion

Requirements:
1. Use a synthesis of research evidence and non-research evidence when writing this section of the paper.
2. Write one concise paragraph providing a clear and logical summation of the paper.

10 pts

Highest Level of Performance
Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth conclusion.

9 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance
Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient conclusion.

8 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial conclusion.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance
Provides fewer than all requirements and/or provides an undeveloped conclusion.
10 pts

APA Style and Standards

Requirements:
1. Use appropriate Level I headers.
2. Reference and citations are in current APA style.
3. Paper length is 6-8 pages excluding title, reference pages, and appendix.

15 pts

Highest Level of Performance
Includes all requirements and provides an excellent APA style and standards.

14 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance
Includes all requirements and provides a very good APA style and standards.

12 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance
Includes fewer than all requirements and provides a basic APA style and standards.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance
Includes fewer than all requirements of APA style and standards and/or provides poor style and standards.
15 pts

Clarity of Writing

Requirements:
1. Standard English usage and mechanics
2. No spelling or typographical errors
3. Organized presentation of ideas

15 pts

Highest Level of Performance
Includes all requirements and demonstrates excellent clarity of writing.

14 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance
Includes all requirements and demonstrates sufficient clarity of writing.

12 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or demonstrates basic clarity of writing.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or demonstrates poor clarity of writing.
15 pts

Revisions

Requirements:
1. All faculty requested revisions are completed based on course faculty feedback from Week 4 Assignment.
2. The Week 6 Assignment is submitted as a Clean Copy (no track changes or comments are visible).

20 pts

Highest Level of Performance
Includes all requirements and provides in-depth revisions.

18 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance
Includes all requirements and provides sufficient revisions.

16 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides partial revisions.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance
No revisions are made
20 pts

Johns Hopkins Individual Summary Tool

Requirements:
1. Include three quantitative research studies.
2. Complete all sections completely and identify the quality and the levels of evidence.
3. Include the completed Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool and upload with the assignment.

20 pts

Highest Level of Performance
Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth summary table. Includes the the completed Johns Hopkins Summary Tool.

18 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance
Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient summary table. Includes the the completed Johns Hopkins Summary Tool.

16 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial summary table.

0 pts

Failing Level of Performance
Includes fewer than all requirements and/or an undeveloped completed summary table.
20 pts
Total Points: 200

……$20